Agreement Consensus Meaning

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) believes that decisions are taken in a broad consensus. [67] The IETF has firmly refrained from defining a mechanical method of verifying such a consensus, apparently believing that such codification leads to attempts to “play the system”. Instead, a working group or BoF chair must express the “sense of the group.” In 1984, Mr. Schachter found that consensus decisions would result in any common denominator agreement: Schachter, Oscar, “The Nature and Process of Legal Development in International Society” in D.M.; MacDonald, R. St.J.; Johnston (ed), The Structure and Process of International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1983), 745. He preferred not to have a legal agreement until something was negotiated that boiled down to actual commitments, not just the appearance of an agreement. It all started, the consensus seems to be, with the red poultry of the jungle. The emergence of consensus and direct experiences for democracy has been one of the hallmarks of student coordination committee (NCSC) voter registration projects in the southern United States; Students for a Democratic Society `Ad democratic Society` (in the mid-1960s), a few women`s liberation groups (late 1960s to early 1970s) and anti-nuclear and pacifist groups (late 1970s and early 1980s). [58] For example, the anti-nuclear alliance Clamshell alliance and Movement for a New Society has engaged in consensual decision-making processes. [59] The origins of the formation of formal consensus go back much further, to the religious society of friends or Quakers who took technology as early as the 17th century. [60] The Baptists, including some Mennonites, have a history of consensual decision-making[61] and some believe that the Baptists were already practicing consensus at the Martyrs Synod of 1527.

[60] Some Christians attribute consensual decisions to the Bible. The Anabaptist Global Mennonite Encyclopedia refers in particular to Acts 15[62] as an example of consensus in the New Testament. The absence of a legitimate consensual process in the unanimous condemnation of Jesus by corrupt priests[63] in an illegal Sanhedrin court (which had rules preventing unanimous condemnation in an early trial) influenced the views of pacifist Protestants, including Baptists (Mennonites/Amish), Quakkers and shakers. In particular, it influenced his distrust of the appropriate courtrooms and “to be clear about the trial” and to come together in such a way that “everyone must be heard”. [64] But there is no consensus on Daesh`s wear and tear. The alternative would have been to conclude an agreement linking all countries except Syria, Iran and North Korea.

About the Author